SAN JOSE, Calif. — Was Elizabeth Holmes a liar or just naive? That is the supreme problem posed to jurors as prosecution and defense delivered their closing arguments Thursday after 15 weeks of the carefully viewed trial of Holmes, the founder and former CEO of Theranos.

Prosecutors have argued that Holmes, “out of time and out of dollars,” made a decision to lie to buyers in her blood-screening startup to keep the hard cash flowing and to continue to keep pushing the development of her unrealized know-how.

If Holmes had informed investors, people and company partners the truth about her corporation, she by no means would have attracted any revenue, Assistant U.S. Legal professional Jeff Schenk explained to the jurors.

“She selected fraud more than business failure. She chose to be dishonest,” Schenk claimed. “That choice was not only callous, it was felony.”

Holmes, 37, viewed attentively from the courtroom benches just as she has for most of the trial: ramrod straight and approximately motionless. She was flanked as she entered the courthouse by her mother, Noel Holmes her father, Christian Holmes, a previous Enron govt and her spouse, Billy Evans, an heir to a Southern California resort chain.

All through his methodical presentation, Schenk reviewed testimony from practically 30 witnesses, such as individuals who experienced gained defective Theranos check success for HIV, most cancers and a pregnancy.

He also recalled the testimony of 6 traders and a company reporter who testified that Holmes experienced led them to think that Theranos machines have been absolutely able of carrying out hundreds of exams and that they were being actively getting used on U.S. navy health-related evacuation helicopters in Afghanistan.

Bringing up files on monitors in entrance of the jury box, Schenk reviewed how Holmes experienced affixed pharmaceutical firm logos to Theranos lab reports to indicate endorsement. The businesses, Pfizer and Schering-Plough amongst them, had neither endorsed the outcomes nor approved the use of their logos, witnesses testified. Holmes also altered, enhanced or doctored the conclusions to make the reviews surface even rosier, Schenk argued.

“It…